The Buckeye Institute to Court: Don’t Erode Access to America’s Legal System
Columbus, OH – On Thursday, The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Holman v. Vilsack with the U.S. Court […]
Columbus, OH – On Thursday, The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Holman v. Vilsack with the U.S. Court […]
Columbus, OH – On Thursday, The Buckeye Institute announced that its investigation into unconstitutional race-based programs at Ohio’s public law
Columbus, OH – On Thursday, The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond
Columbus, OH – On Thursday, The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Speech
Columbus, OH – On Thursday, The Buckeye Institute sent a final letter to the University of ❌ichigan (aka That School
The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Culley v. Marshall, calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to protect the due process rights of Americans against unconstitutional civil asset forfeiture laws. “Alabama’s civil asset forfeiture law, and others like it, create a powerful financial incentive to abuse state police powers—in violation of due process—to seize valuable property on the mere suspicion of criminal wrongdoing.”
The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Ohio v. Yellen with the U.S. Supreme Court. In its brief, Buckeye called on the court to grant review of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s ruling and the constitutionality of the Biden Administration’s tax mandate included in the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), which prohibited states from directly or indirectly using ARPA funds to offset a reduction in taxes.
The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Texas v. Yellen with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Buckeye Institute previously filed briefs in similar cases (Ohio v. Yellen, West Virginia v. Yellen, and Arizona v. Yellen), which urged those respective courts to rule that the Biden Administration’s tax mandate—included in the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)—is ambiguous and therefore unenforceable and that the treasury secretary cannot fix Congress’s error through regulatory action.
The Buckeye Institute filed its third amicus brief in Ohio v. Yellen, this time with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. In its brief, The Buckeye Institute urged the court to uphold the decision by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, which agreed with Buckeye’s two previous briefs and ruled that the Biden Administration’s tax mandate—included in the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)—is ambiguous and therefore unenforceable, and that the treasury secretary cannot fix Congress’s error through regulatory action.
The Buckeye Institute filed a second amicus brief in Ohio v. Yellen calling upon the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio to grant a permanent injunction to stop enforcement of the federal tax mandate, which was included in the American Rescue Plan Act. This second Buckeye brief argues that recent guidance from the U.S. Treasury Department fails to cure the deficiencies of the ambiguous and unconstitutional tax mandate.