The Buckeye Institute

Legal

Legal, Press Releases

“In Cincinnati Gun Case, The Buckeye Institute Urges Court to Properly Apply Ohio Law”

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in West v. Cincinnati urging Ohio’s First District Court of Appeals to uphold the lower court’s ruling that correctly interpreted the constitutionality of the state’s preemption law. While noting that there are legitimate debates about policies requiring firearm handling and storage techniques, The Buckeye Institute argues in its brief that this case is about Ohio’s firearms preemption law, which the Ohio Supreme Court found to be constitutional in Cleveland v. Ohio.

Legal, Press Releases

The Buckeye Institute to SCOTUS: Protect Americans from Criminal Punishment Congress Did Not Specify

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Garland v. Cargill with the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that courts must interpret criminal statutes narrowly, with leniency towards the accused. Known as the rule of lenity, this strict level of review protects Americans from criminal punishment that Congress did not specify. “With the stroke of a pen, unelected federal bureaucrats at the ATF turned more than 500,000 Americans into criminals. Something only Congress has the authority to do.” 

Legal

The Buckeye Institute Calls on SCOTUS to Stop New York’s Censorship by Proxy in NRA Case

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in National Rifle Association v. Vullo, calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to stop government officials in New York from threatening—or “jawboning”—businesses that the state regulates from working with the National Rifle Association (NRA). As Andrew M. Grossman, a senior legal fellow at The Buckeye Institute, and David B. Rivkin Jr. wrote in The Wall Street Journal, New York’s “goal was to punish the NRA for its gun-rights advocacy.”

Legal, Press Releases

The Buckeye Institute to Ohio Supreme Court: Governments Can’t Profit from “Public Nuisance”

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief with the Ohio Supreme Court in Trumbull County v. Purdue Pharma (National Prescription Opiate Litigation), arguing that awarding the government monetary damages as punishment for a public nuisance is not allowed under Ohio law. “The opioid epidemic is a tragedy that has destroyed and damaged lives across Ohio and the country. And it is appropriate, even necessary, for the courts to hold those who committed illegal acts accountable.”

Legal, Press Releases

The Buckeye Institute Calls on Michigan Supreme Court to Protect Homeowners from Unethical Government Practices

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Schafer v. Kent County with Michigan’s Supreme Court, arguing that Kent County violated Michigan’s just compensation clause when it sold Matthew Schafer and Harry and Lilly Hucklebury’s homes to pay delinquent property taxes and pocketed the surplus as windfall profits. “Seizing these profits was always unconstitutional, and Kent County should be embarrassed to ask the court to let it pocket these ill-gotten gains.”

Legal, Press Releases

“The Buckeye Institute Calls on Court to Uphold Ohio’s Preemption Law, Protect Gun Owners’ Rights”

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Cincinnati v. Ohio with Ohio’s First District Court of Appeals, calling on the court to reaffirm the constitutionality of the state’s preemption law, which protects the Second Amendment rights of Ohioans. “Yet again, officials in one of Ohio’s largest cities are attempting to address a rise in violent crime by limiting the constitutional rights of law-abiding Ohioans. While violent crime is certainly a problem that cities must address, it is irrelevant to whether Ohio’s preemption law is constitutional.”

Legal, Press Releases

The Buckeye Institute Charges Government Union with Wage Theft in New Case

The Buckeye Institute filed Littlejohn v. AFSCME with the State Employment Relations Board, asserting an unfair labor practice charge by AFSCME and the city of Cincinnati against Necole Littlejohn, a hospital employee with the city of Cincinnati, who had money illegally taken out of her paychecks by her employer and given to the government union. “Ms. Littlejohn is not a member of the government union, but the union continues to use an unethical legal sleight-of-hand to steal money from her paycheck.” 

Legal, Press Releases

“In Columbus Gun Case, Ohio Court Rules in The Buckeye Institute’s Favor”

The Buckeye Institute reacted to the ruling by Ohio’s Fifth District Court of Appeals in Doe v. Columbus granting Buckeye’s request to dismiss the city of Columbus’ appeal of Judge Gormley’s April 25 ruling, which granted Buckeye’s request for a preliminary injunction. “The Fifth District’s ruling is a victory for The Buckeye Institute and its clients, and all residents of Columbus who want to exercise their constitutional right to bear arms.”

Legal, Press Releases

“The Buckeye Institute Calls on SCOTUS to Assert Judicial Independence, Overturn Chevron”

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in Relentless v. U.S. Department of Commerce, asking the court to overturn Chevron and put an end to judicial deference to executive agencies’ interpretation of the law. “The practice of courts relying on agencies to interpret the law has proven to be dysfunctional and inconsistent with our constitutional system. It is time for the Supreme Court to throw Chevron overboard.”

Legal, Press Releases

The Buckeye Institute Appeals Union Wage Theft Case

The Buckeye Institute filed its appeal in Darling v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) with Ohio’s Tenth District Court of Appeals on behalf of five hardworking Ohio public employees who had money illegally taken out of their paychecks— for months, and in some cases, years—by their employers and given to a government union. “Ohio Supreme Court precedent has given common pleas courts jurisdiction to decide private contractual disputes like the ones presented in Darling v. AFSCME.” 

Scroll to Top