The Buckeye Institute

Darling v. AFSCME

For media inquiries, please contact:
Lisa Gates, Vice President of Communications, The Buckeye Institute
(614) 224-3255 or Lisa@BuckeyeInstitute.org

Resolution to the Case

On October 1, 2024, the Ohio Supreme Court declined to hear The Buckeye Institute’s appeal on the question of whether the courts or the State Employment Relations Board have jurisdiction in these types of cases.

In Littlejohn v. AFSCME, the State Employment Relations Board ruled it did not have jurisdiction in these types of cases. Littlejohn v. AFSCME is pending with the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas to resolve the question of jurisdiction in these types of cases.

Background on the Case

Key Questions in the Case: Can a union continue to collect dues for the duration of the union contract from people who have quit the union and are no longer members? Can a union place limitation on when and how a member may leave the union and impose a penalty for leaving?

On June 27, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Janus v. AFSCME, holding that public employees cannot be forced to support political speech or other activities without their affirmative consent. This opinion reinforced the law regarding public employees’ rights to avoid compelled payments to the unions chosen to represent them.

Despite the historic court decision, many government unions have refused to recognize workers’ Janus rights and have continued to illegally take money from public employees’ paychecks—employees whom the unions themselves have acknowledged have quit the union and are therefore no longer union members. Using a legal sleight-of-hand to claim that workers can quit their union only during specified opt-out windows that may be months or even years in the future, government unions claim that they can keep taking money from workers’ paychecks regardless of their status as non-union members.

These unions are claiming that the employees signed a contract authorizing the unions to keep deducting membership dues from their paychecks even after they are no longer members of the union. Ohio’s law simply does not allow this unethical practice, and it is time for the court to tell the unions and the government to stop illegally taking money from workers’ paychecks.

About Buckeye’s Clients

After winning settlements in favor of five of its clients, The Buckeye Institute is now representing five public employees from across Ohio:

  • Chelsea Kolacki of Toledo is an office assistant for the Maumee City School District. She was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before she resigned on September 24, 2020.
  • Kristy Kolacki of Toledo is a secretary for the Maumee City School District. She was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before she resigned on September 24, 2020.
  • Laura Langsdale of Akron is a custodian for the Springfield Local School District. She was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before she resigned on October 20, 2020.
  • Ronnie Legg of Galloway is a driver for the Columbus City School District. He was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before he resigned on August 20, 2020.
  • Stephen Tulga of Columbus is a bus driver for the Upper Arlington City School District. He was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before he resigned on May 6, 2021.

The Buckeye Institute won settlements in favor of five of its clients:

  • Lukas Darling of Campbell was a property enforcement officer for the Boardman Township Planning and Zoning Department. He was a member of AFSCME before he resigned on November 4, 2020.
  • Tonya Iannarino of Toledo is an OMB specialist for Toledo Public Schools. She was a member of AFSCME before she resigned on November 13, 2020.
  • Barb Larrow of Maumee is a bus driver for Toledo Public Schools. She was a member of AFSCME before she resigned on March 11, 2021.
  • Deborah Pinion of Upper Sandusky is a highway technician with the Ohio Department of Transportation. She was previously a member of AFSCME before she resigned on March 20, 2020.
  • Christin Wilkins of Bowling Green was an eighth-grade science teacher for the Columbus City School District. She was a member of the Ohio Education Association before she resigned on August 25, 2020.

Facts of the Case

INACTIVE CASE

CASE

Add Your Heading Text Here

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Read More › 

Current Status

On October 1, 2024, the Ohio Supreme Court declined to hear The Buckeye Institute’s appeal on the question of whether the courts or the State Employment Relations Board have jurisdiction in these types of cases.

Ohio Supreme Court: 2024-1051
Lower Court: 23AP-645

December 19, 2022

Franklin County Court of Common Pleas

Robert Alt, President and Chief Executive Officer, The Buckeye Institute
David C. Tryon, Director of Litigation, The Buckeye Institute
Jay R. Carson, Senior Litigator, The Buckeye Institute

Deducting union membership dues from the paychecks of workers who have quit their unions is illegal because the “contract” between the unions and the employees has been rescinded or voided. This assertion is based upon Ohio contract law, specifically the doctrines of recission based on mutual repudiation, mutual mistake, unenforceable penalty, unconscionable contracts of adhesion, and unjust enrichment.

The Buckeye Institute’s clients are asking for damages in the amount of the union membership dues taken from them after they quit their unions, and they are requesting an injunction to prevent further union membership dues deductions from their paychecks.

Timeline of the Case

Join Our Email List

More About Our Work

The Buckeye Institute Files Brief in National Prescription Opiate Litigation

The Buckeye Institute filed its amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in National Prescription Opiate Litigation, calling on the court to stop the government from using...

The Buckeye Institute and National Right to Work File Suit Demanding Union Return Wages Taken from Workers

The Buckeye Institute, in partnership with National Right to Work Foundation, filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio on behalf of Penny Wilson, Theresa...

The Buckeye Institute Files Lawsuit Challenging IRS Collection of Donor Data

The Buckeye Institute filed a lawsuit challenging a decades-old tax law that forces the IRS to demand that nonprofit charities hand over the private information of their largest donors every...

The Buckeye Institute Files Suit Against Biden Administration Over Illegal Student Loan Debt Cancellation

The Buckeye Institute filed a brand new lawsuit with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division challenging the Biden Administration’s proposed and illegal...

The Buckeye Institute Urges U.S. Supreme Court to Protect Attorney-Client Privilege

The Buckeye Institute filed its amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in In Re Grand Jury, calling on the court to protect attorney-client privilege in the tax context. “The U.S. tax code is...

The Buckeye Institute to Court: Tell Congress to Give Clear Direction to OSHA

The Buckeye Institute filed its amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Allstates Refractory Contractors v. Walsh, calling on the court to protect worker and workplace...

The Buckeye Institute Calls on Court to Rein in Overzealous EPA Regulators

The Buckeye Institute filed its amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Texas v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), calling on the court to stop...

The Buckeye Institute to U.S. Supreme Court: Union Vandalism is Not a “Protected Activity” in Labor Disputes

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in Glacier Northwest v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, urging the court to make it clear that the destruction of...

The Buckeye Institute Fights Biden’s ARPA Tax Mandate in Court (Again)

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Texas v. Yellen with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Buckeye Institute previously filed briefs in similar cases (Ohio v. Yellen...
Scroll to Top