The Buckeye Institute

Darling v. AFSCME

For media inquiries, please contact:
Lisa Gates, Vice President of Communications, The Buckeye Institute
(614) 224-3255 or Lisa@BuckeyeInstitute.org

Resolution to the Case

On October 1, 2024, the Ohio Supreme Court declined to hear The Buckeye Institute’s appeal on the question of whether the courts or the State Employment Relations Board have jurisdiction in these types of cases.

In Littlejohn v. AFSCME, the State Employment Relations Board ruled it did not have jurisdiction in these types of cases. Littlejohn v. AFSCME is pending with the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas to resolve the question of jurisdiction in these types of cases.

Background on the Case

Key Questions in the Case: Can a union continue to collect dues for the duration of the union contract from people who have quit the union and are no longer members? Can a union place limitation on when and how a member may leave the union and impose a penalty for leaving?

On June 27, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Janus v. AFSCME, holding that public employees cannot be forced to support political speech or other activities without their affirmative consent. This opinion reinforced the law regarding public employees’ rights to avoid compelled payments to the unions chosen to represent them.

Despite the historic court decision, many government unions have refused to recognize workers’ Janus rights and have continued to illegally take money from public employees’ paychecks—employees whom the unions themselves have acknowledged have quit the union and are therefore no longer union members. Using a legal sleight-of-hand to claim that workers can quit their union only during specified opt-out windows that may be months or even years in the future, government unions claim that they can keep taking money from workers’ paychecks regardless of their status as non-union members.

These unions are claiming that the employees signed a contract authorizing the unions to keep deducting membership dues from their paychecks even after they are no longer members of the union. Ohio’s law simply does not allow this unethical practice, and it is time for the court to tell the unions and the government to stop illegally taking money from workers’ paychecks.

About Buckeye’s Clients

After winning settlements in favor of five of its clients, The Buckeye Institute is now representing five public employees from across Ohio:

  • Chelsea Kolacki of Toledo is an office assistant for the Maumee City School District. She was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before she resigned on September 24, 2020.
  • Kristy Kolacki of Toledo is a secretary for the Maumee City School District. She was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before she resigned on September 24, 2020.
  • Laura Langsdale of Akron is a custodian for the Springfield Local School District. She was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before she resigned on October 20, 2020.
  • Ronnie Legg of Galloway is a driver for the Columbus City School District. He was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before he resigned on August 20, 2020.
  • Stephen Tulga of Columbus is a bus driver for the Upper Arlington City School District. He was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before he resigned on May 6, 2021.

The Buckeye Institute won settlements in favor of five of its clients:

  • Lukas Darling of Campbell was a property enforcement officer for the Boardman Township Planning and Zoning Department. He was a member of AFSCME before he resigned on November 4, 2020.
  • Tonya Iannarino of Toledo is an OMB specialist for Toledo Public Schools. She was a member of AFSCME before she resigned on November 13, 2020.
  • Barb Larrow of Maumee is a bus driver for Toledo Public Schools. She was a member of AFSCME before she resigned on March 11, 2021.
  • Deborah Pinion of Upper Sandusky is a highway technician with the Ohio Department of Transportation. She was previously a member of AFSCME before she resigned on March 20, 2020.
  • Christin Wilkins of Bowling Green was an eighth-grade science teacher for the Columbus City School District. She was a member of the Ohio Education Association before she resigned on August 25, 2020.

Facts of the Case

INACTIVE CASE

CASE

Add Your Heading Text Here

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Read More › 

Current Status

On October 1, 2024, the Ohio Supreme Court declined to hear The Buckeye Institute’s appeal on the question of whether the courts or the State Employment Relations Board have jurisdiction in these types of cases.

Ohio Supreme Court: 2024-1051
Lower Court: 23AP-645

December 19, 2022

Franklin County Court of Common Pleas

Robert Alt, President and Chief Executive Officer, The Buckeye Institute
David C. Tryon, Director of Litigation, The Buckeye Institute
Jay R. Carson, Senior Litigator, The Buckeye Institute

Deducting union membership dues from the paychecks of workers who have quit their unions is illegal because the “contract” between the unions and the employees has been rescinded or voided. This assertion is based upon Ohio contract law, specifically the doctrines of recission based on mutual repudiation, mutual mistake, unenforceable penalty, unconscionable contracts of adhesion, and unjust enrichment.

The Buckeye Institute’s clients are asking for damages in the amount of the union membership dues taken from them after they quit their unions, and they are requesting an injunction to prevent further union membership dues deductions from their paychecks.

Timeline of the Case

Join Our Email List

More About Our Work

The Buckeye Institute Urges SCOTUS to End Censorship by Proxy

The Buckeye Institute filed its third amicus brief in Murthy v. Missouri (previously Missouri v. Biden), calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the preliminary injunction and stop the federal...

The Buckeye Institute Joins Brief in South Carolina School Choice Case

The Buckeye Institute joined with Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) in filing an amicus brief in Eidson v. South Carolina Department of Education, calling on the South Carolina Supreme...

Raise A Glass: The Buckeye Institute Files Lawsuit to Overturn Federal Ban on Home Distilling

The Buckeye Institute filed a lawsuit on behalf of John Ream of Licking County, Ohio, asking the court to overturn the federal government’s ban on the home distilling of spirit beverages...

“In Cincinnati Gun Case, The Buckeye Institute Urges Court to Properly Apply Ohio Law”

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in West v. Cincinnati urging Ohio’s First District Court of Appeals to uphold the lower court’s ruling that correctly interpreted the...

The Buckeye Institute to SCOTUS: Protect Americans from Criminal Punishment Congress Did Not Specify

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Garland v. Cargill with the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that courts must interpret criminal statutes narrowly, with leniency towards the accused. Known...

The Buckeye Institute Calls on SCOTUS to Stop New York’s Censorship by Proxy in NRA Case

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in National Rifle Association v. Vullo, calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to stop government officials in New York from threatening—or...

The Buckeye Institute to Ohio Supreme Court: Governments Can’t Profit from “Public Nuisance”

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief with the Ohio Supreme Court in Trumbull County v. Purdue Pharma (National Prescription Opiate Litigation), arguing that awarding the government monetary...

The Buckeye Institute Calls on Michigan Supreme Court to Protect Homeowners from Unethical Government Practices

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Schafer v. Kent County with Michigan’s Supreme Court, arguing that Kent County violated Michigan’s just compensation clause when it sold...

“The Buckeye Institute Calls on Court to Uphold Ohio’s Preemption Law, Protect Gun Owners’ Rights”

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Cincinnati v. Ohio with Ohio’s First District Court of Appeals, calling on the court to reaffirm the constitutionality of the state’s...
Scroll to Top