The Buckeye Institute

Darling v. AFSCME

For media inquiries, please contact:
Lisa Gates, Vice President of Communications, The Buckeye Institute
(614) 224-3255 or Lisa@BuckeyeInstitute.org

Resolution to the Case

On October 1, 2024, the Ohio Supreme Court declined to hear The Buckeye Institute’s appeal on the question of whether the courts or the State Employment Relations Board have jurisdiction in these types of cases.

In Littlejohn v. AFSCME, the State Employment Relations Board ruled it did not have jurisdiction in these types of cases. Littlejohn v. AFSCME is pending with the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas to resolve the question of jurisdiction in these types of cases.

Background on the Case

Key Questions in the Case: Can a union continue to collect dues for the duration of the union contract from people who have quit the union and are no longer members? Can a union place limitation on when and how a member may leave the union and impose a penalty for leaving?

On June 27, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Janus v. AFSCME, holding that public employees cannot be forced to support political speech or other activities without their affirmative consent. This opinion reinforced the law regarding public employees’ rights to avoid compelled payments to the unions chosen to represent them.

Despite the historic court decision, many government unions have refused to recognize workers’ Janus rights and have continued to illegally take money from public employees’ paychecks—employees whom the unions themselves have acknowledged have quit the union and are therefore no longer union members. Using a legal sleight-of-hand to claim that workers can quit their union only during specified opt-out windows that may be months or even years in the future, government unions claim that they can keep taking money from workers’ paychecks regardless of their status as non-union members.

These unions are claiming that the employees signed a contract authorizing the unions to keep deducting membership dues from their paychecks even after they are no longer members of the union. Ohio’s law simply does not allow this unethical practice, and it is time for the court to tell the unions and the government to stop illegally taking money from workers’ paychecks.

About Buckeye’s Clients

After winning settlements in favor of five of its clients, The Buckeye Institute is now representing five public employees from across Ohio:

  • Chelsea Kolacki of Toledo is an office assistant for the Maumee City School District. She was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before she resigned on September 24, 2020.
  • Kristy Kolacki of Toledo is a secretary for the Maumee City School District. She was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before she resigned on September 24, 2020.
  • Laura Langsdale of Akron is a custodian for the Springfield Local School District. She was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before she resigned on October 20, 2020.
  • Ronnie Legg of Galloway is a driver for the Columbus City School District. He was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before he resigned on August 20, 2020.
  • Stephen Tulga of Columbus is a bus driver for the Upper Arlington City School District. He was a member of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees before he resigned on May 6, 2021.

The Buckeye Institute won settlements in favor of five of its clients:

  • Lukas Darling of Campbell was a property enforcement officer for the Boardman Township Planning and Zoning Department. He was a member of AFSCME before he resigned on November 4, 2020.
  • Tonya Iannarino of Toledo is an OMB specialist for Toledo Public Schools. She was a member of AFSCME before she resigned on November 13, 2020.
  • Barb Larrow of Maumee is a bus driver for Toledo Public Schools. She was a member of AFSCME before she resigned on March 11, 2021.
  • Deborah Pinion of Upper Sandusky is a highway technician with the Ohio Department of Transportation. She was previously a member of AFSCME before she resigned on March 20, 2020.
  • Christin Wilkins of Bowling Green was an eighth-grade science teacher for the Columbus City School District. She was a member of the Ohio Education Association before she resigned on August 25, 2020.

Facts of the Case

INACTIVE CASE

CASE

Add Your Heading Text Here

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Read More › 

Current Status

On October 1, 2024, the Ohio Supreme Court declined to hear The Buckeye Institute’s appeal on the question of whether the courts or the State Employment Relations Board have jurisdiction in these types of cases.

Ohio Supreme Court: 2024-1051
Lower Court: 23AP-645

December 19, 2022

Franklin County Court of Common Pleas

Robert Alt, President and Chief Executive Officer, The Buckeye Institute
David C. Tryon, Director of Litigation, The Buckeye Institute
Jay R. Carson, Senior Litigator, The Buckeye Institute

Deducting union membership dues from the paychecks of workers who have quit their unions is illegal because the “contract” between the unions and the employees has been rescinded or voided. This assertion is based upon Ohio contract law, specifically the doctrines of recission based on mutual repudiation, mutual mistake, unenforceable penalty, unconscionable contracts of adhesion, and unjust enrichment.

The Buckeye Institute’s clients are asking for damages in the amount of the union membership dues taken from them after they quit their unions, and they are requesting an injunction to prevent further union membership dues deductions from their paychecks.

Timeline of the Case

Join Our Email List

More About Our Work

The Buckeye Institute Charges Government Union with Wage Theft in New Case

The Buckeye Institute filed Littlejohn v. AFSCME with the State Employment Relations Board, asserting an unfair labor practice charge by AFSCME and the city of Cincinnati against Necole...

“In Columbus Gun Case, Ohio Court Rules in The Buckeye Institute’s Favor”

The Buckeye Institute reacted to the ruling by Ohio’s Fifth District Court of Appeals in Doe v. Columbus granting Buckeye’s request to dismiss the city of Columbus’ appeal of Judge...

“The Buckeye Institute Calls on SCOTUS to Assert Judicial Independence, Overturn Chevron”

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in Relentless v. U.S. Department of Commerce, asking the court to overturn Chevron and put an end to judicial deference to...

The Buckeye Institute Appeals Union Wage Theft Case

The Buckeye Institute filed its appeal in Darling v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) with Ohio’s Tenth District Court of Appeals on behalf of five...

The Buckeye Institute Calls on SCOTUS to Tell States They Cannot Ignore the Constitution

The Buckeye Institute joined an amicus brief filed in DeVillier v. Texas, calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to reaffirm the constitutional right to seek just compensation in federal court when the...

The Buckeye Institute & NFIB to SCOTUS: Stop Governments from Using Permits to Extort Money from Citizens

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to protect the rights of property owners from government extortion, where, in this case...

The Buckeye Institute Joins NFIB Brief Calling on SCOTUS to Allow Legal Challenges to Unlawful Government Regulations

The Buckeye Institute joined the National Federation of Independent Business in filing an amicus brief in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, calling on the U.S...

“In Brief to Court, The Buckeye Institute Argues Race-Based Litmus Tests Violate Law and U.S. Constitution”

The Buckeye Institute joined the American Civil Rights Project and the Manhattan Institute in filing an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in American Alliance for...

“In Brief to SCOTUS, The Buckeye Institute Argues Privileges or Immunities Clause Protects Property Owners’ Rights”

The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Yim v. Seattle. “Small-scale landlords provide an invaluable service to their communities. They rent apartments...
Scroll to Top